﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Agricultural Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2769-8874</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub"></issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Trend Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31586/ojar.2021.119</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAR-119</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>
          Genetic Evaluation of Growth Traits in New Synthetic Rabbit Line in Egypt
        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdel-Kafy</surname>
<given-names>El-Sayed</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>El-Deighadi</surname>
<given-names>Amira S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shabaan</surname>
<given-names>Hoda M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farid</surname>
<given-names>Wael H.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>A.</surname>
<given-names>Ali</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zain El-Abdeen A.</surname>
<given-names>Sabra</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>A.</surname>
<given-names>Farid</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<aff id="af1"><label>1</label>Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agriculture Research Center, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt </aff>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>17</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="pub">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#xa9; Copyright 2021 by authors and Trend Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        Native Middle Egypt Rabbit breed (NMER) was crossbred with Gaint Flander rabbits to create a synthetic line. This study was aimed to evaluate the genetic estimates of this synthetic line with comparing to the purebreds. A crossbreeding was carried out by mating bucks of Gaint Flander (G) with does of NMER (N) to get F1 (&#x000bd;N&#x000bd;G), then does and bucks of F1 were mated to get F2 (&#x000bd;N&#x000bd;G)2, followed by two generations of inter se-mating to get a new synthetic line is called Egy-line with a genetic structure of ((&#x000bd;N&#x000bd;G)2)2. Heritability estimates for body weights were generally moderate and ranged from 0.10 to 0.24, while the estimates of heritability for growth rate were low and moderate and ranging from 0.01 to 0.23. Common little effects of body weight were large as weaning (0.61), then declined gradually as the rabbit grew older. Also, the same trends were observed for relative growth rate (RGR). The direct additive effects were positive and highly significant for all body weights at different ages, favoring Gaint Flander and heavier comparing with NMER rabbits. Most relative growth rates during different intervals were non-significant. Gaint Flander was highly significant and heavier in maternal additive effects it in different weeks of age comparing with NMER rabbits. Direct heterosis effect for most bodyweight was positive and highly significant, and percentages of direct heterosis increased generally with the advance of age. Maternal heterosis for growth rates from 5 to 6, 8 to 10, and 10 to 12 week was positive, only. Direct recombination effects for most bodyweight were positive and highly significantly exclude weight at 5 and 6 weeks. It is concluded that a new synesthetic line (Egy-line) has proven its superiority and performance well in all different body weights and most growth rates compared to other parents and crossbreds.
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd-group><kwd>Rabbit; direct and maternal additive effects; direct and maternal heterosis effects; synthetic line; Egypt</kwd>
</kwd-group>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title><p>An Egyptian domestic rabbit is found in rural areas of Delta, Middle and Upper Egypt [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">1</xref>]. In the middle of last century, Ministry of Agriculture researchers tried to improve native Egyptian rabbits(Baladi rabbit) by crossbreeding for several generations of Baladi with the Flemish Giant(FG)[
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">2</xref>]. This trial produced Baladi Red (BR), Baladi Black (BB) and Baladi White (BW) with &#x26;#x0215b; Baladi and&#x26;#x0215e; FG. The BR, BB and Gabali breeds used in crossing with V-line and developed by selection of synthetic lines were named APRI, Alexantria, and Moshtohor lines [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">3</xref>], receptively. The main interest in crossbreeding is to profit from their complementarity and the effect of heterosis [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">4</xref>]. Direct and maternal additive effects and direct heterosis on post-weaning body weight traits were significant and favored V-line rabbits compared to Baladi Red [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">5</xref>]. Also, direct and maternal genetic effects were higher in V-line than Gabali rabbits for most post-weaning growth traits [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">6</xref>]. The superiority of the Gabali breed in growth was over the V-line could be because of the complementary the superiority that exhibited by the V-line in prolificacy [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">7</xref>]. This complementarity was beneficial for the cross between Gabali and V-line and for the global performance of the line synthesized; Moshtohor line [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R27">27</xref>].</p>
<p>Advantage of the effect of heterosis requires a complex scheme through maintenance and selection of the pure stocks that had seemed too complex to set up in Egypt where the structures were not enough developed to accompany this process. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">8</xref>] reported that the establishment of rabbit farms had a popular target in Egypt that caused spreading the foreign breeds and lines; New Zealand White (NZW), California (Cal), V-Line and Hy-plus for their fast productive and reproductive performance, but small holders discovered these rabbits are not suitable with small-scale production system. In 2009, Animal Production Research Institute (APRI) established rabbit herd nucleus from three governorates in Middle Egypt and the collected rabbits were named NMER as abbreviation for Native Middle Egypt Rabbit breed [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">9</xref>]. NMER seemed low sensitive to the negative effects of summer conditions in their reproductive traits than the local lines and foreign breeds rose in Egypt, but the weight of the young and mature in NMER is still low[
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">9</xref>]. We choice improve the NMER rabbits by to create a synthetic line to profit from their genetic potential. So, this study aimed to evaluate the genetic estimates of a new synthetic line with comparing to purebreds NMER and Gaint Flander rabbits; direct and maternal additive effects; direct and maternal heterosis effects and direct recombination effects between for growth traits.</p>
</sec><sec id="sec2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title><title>2.1. Animals and Experimental design</title><p>This study was located at Sakha research farm belonging to Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agricultural Research Center, Egypt for 4 years, 2016-2020. Experimental procedures were conducted accordance with Animal Ethics Committee guideline of APRI, and the study plan was approved by the Institute&#x26;#x02019;s Research Committee in December 2015 (code no. 020203429).</p>
<p>A crossbreeding was carried out by mating bucks of Gaint Flander (G) and does of Native of Mid-Egypt rabbit (NMER) to get F1 (&#x26;#x000bd;N&#x26;#x000bd;G), then does and bucks of this F1 were mated to get the F2 (&#x26;#x000bd;N&#x26;#x000bd;G), followed by two generations of inter se-mating to get a new synthetic line is called Egy-Line with a genetic structure of ((&#x26;#x000bd;N&#x26;#x000bd;G)<sup>2</sup>)<sup>2</sup>. </p>
<p>A total of 69 sires and 338 dams used for producing 1270rabbits were used for collection the data. The traits recorded were individual body weight (BW) at 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks of age. Also, relative growth rate (RGR) measured according to [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref>] as equal = (W2-W1)/ (&#x26;#x000bd;(W2-W1)) x 100, where W1 was body weight at the beginning of the period, and W2, body weight at the end of the period. Relative growth rates were at different age intervals by week (W); 5-6W, 6-8W, 8-10W, 10-12W, 12-14W, 14-16W, 16-18W, 18-20W and 5-20W.</p>
<title>2.2. Animal Management</title><p>Bucks and doses of rabbits were housed individually in metal cages (40 &#x26;#x000d7; 50 &#x26;#x000d7; 60 cm) which provided with nipple watering and metal feeders. The does introduced to buck&#x26;#x02019;s cage and the date of service was recorded and dose palpated at about 14th day after service. Before expected date of kindling by about 3 days, the cage of positive doses attached by nest boxes (40 &#x26;#x000d7; 40 &#x26;#x000d7; 40 cm) with some clean rice straw. Negative palpated does were reintroduced to buck's cage again after palpation. Kits were weaned at thirty days of age by transferring them to the fattening cages (40 &#x26;#x000d7; 50 &#x26;#x000d7; 50 cm) which were provided with metal feeders and nipple watering system. Kits were identified by metal numbers in ear. The rabbits were fed ad libitum with commercial pelleted diets had 17.5% crude protein, 14-16% crude fibers and 2300-2500 kcal/kg diet digestible energy. The cages were daily cleaned by removing the manure while maintaining a good ventilation and temperature as possible inside the house.</p>
<title>2.3. Statistical analysis</title><p>Variances and co-variances were obtained using REML method of VARCOMP procedure of (SAS, Cary, North Carolina, USA, and www.sas.com). Data were analyzed by applying the single-trait animal model of body weights and growth traits by applying STDFREML programs of [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>]. </p>
<p>Values of starting mixed model were received by applying REML method of VARCOMP procedure of in SAS 9.3 statistical analysis software (www.sas.com). Data were analyzed using a single-trait animal model of body weights and growth traits using STDFREML programs of [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>], to obtain the heritability (h<sup>2</sup>); common litter effects (c<sup>2</sup>); random error effects (e<sup>2</sup>). Analyses were done according to the general model: y = Xb + Z1a + Z2p + e.(Model: 1). Where: y= Vector of record of the trait, X= Incidence matrix of fixed effects; b = vector of fixed effects of genetic groups of rabbits (5 levels); Z1and Z2= incidence matrices corresponding to random effects of additive (a) and common litter effect (p), respectively.</p>
<p>Data were carried out by weighted least-squares means a method in the procedure GLM in SAS 9.3. To obtain least-squares and used to compare means by Duncan&#x26;#x02019;s multiple range test for the traits characteristics. Yi = &#x26;#x000b5; + Bi + ei. (Model:2). Where: Yi = the parameters on the i<sup>th</sup> body weights and relative growth traits, &#x26;#x000b5; = the overall mean, Bi = the fixed effect of the i<sup>th</sup> of genetic groups of rabbits (i= 5 levels) and ei = the random deviation of all the other effects no specified the model. However, least-squares means were used as input data for the program package CBE, version 4.0 [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref>] that were used to estimate the crossbreeding parameters for every group of crossbreds and all analyzed traits. The estimation was carried out by weighted least squares means according to the Dickerson model [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref>]. </p>
</sec><sec id="sec3">
<title>Results and Discussion</title><title>3.1. Means and coefficients of variation (CV %) of traits</title><p>Means estimates of body weights increase with age while relative growth rates (RGR) at different ages decrease with age (Table 1). This may be due to the rapid growth of rabbits at young ages, and within the range noted by [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">14</xref>]. With the previous results, improvement in growth rates may be achieved by applying phenotypic selection. Estimates of coefficient of variation (CV%) for body weights decreased with age and this trend may be reflected with the bunnies' advance in age, and they become progressively less sensitive to non-genetic maternal effects [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">15</xref>]. CV% in the relative growth rates estimates during all periods were not at the same pace and were ranged between 13.3 to 39.4 and this is in agreement with findings [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">14</xref>] while they higher than coefficient of variation of the growth traits in findings [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R16">16</xref>] that ranged between 21% to 28%. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p><b>Table 1</b><b>.</b><b> </b>Means &#x000b1;S.E and coefficients of variation (CV%) of body weights and relative growth rates (RGR)</p>
</caption>

<table>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Body weights:</bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5 weeks</td>
<td align="left">467.0</td>
<td align="left">3.6</td>
<td align="left">27.2</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6 weeks</td>
<td align="left">584.2</td>
<td align="left">4.3</td>
<td align="left">25.9</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8 weeks</td>
<td align="left">803.6</td>
<td align="left">5.8</td>
<td align="left">24.9</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10 weeks</td>
<td align="left">1088.3</td>
<td align="left">7.7</td>
<td align="left">22.8</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12 weeks</td>
<td align="left">1329.6</td>
<td align="left">9.3</td>
<td align="left">21.1</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14 weeks</td>
<td align="left">1558.7</td>
<td align="left">11.0</td>
<td align="left">19.6</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16 weeks</td>
<td align="left">1735.2</td>
<td align="left">12.6</td>
<td align="left">19.1</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18 weeks</td>
<td align="left">1923.0</td>
<td align="left">13.9</td>
<td align="left">18.5</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20 weeks</td>
<td align="left">2127.3</td>
<td align="left">15.2</td>
<td align="left">17.9</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>RGR at age intervals: </bold></td>
<td align="left">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="left">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="left">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-6 week </td>
<td align="left">21.8</td>
<td align="left">0.25</td>
<td align="left">39.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6-8 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">31.2</td>
<td align="left">0.36</td>
<td align="left">39.4</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8-10 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">28.1</td>
<td align="left">0.33</td>
<td align="left">37.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10-12 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">18.8</td>
<td align="left">0.22</td>
<td align="left">34.4</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12-14 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">15.3</td>
<td align="left">0.14</td>
<td align="left">25.5</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14-16 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">11.8</td>
<td align="left">0.14</td>
<td align="left">32.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16-18 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">10.3</td>
<td align="left">0.11</td>
<td align="left">33.4</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18-20 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">10.2</td>
<td align="left">0.10</td>
<td align="left">26.6</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-20 week&#x00026;nbsp; </td>
<td align="left">125.2</td>
<td align="left">0.67</td>
<td align="left">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><title>3.2. Heritabilities and common litter effects</title><p>Heritabilities estimates for body weights and relative growth rate were generally moderate and ranged from 0.10 to 0.24 (Table 2). Values of the heritabilities in body weight are nearly to the estimates obtained by [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R18">18</xref>]. The estimates of heritabilities for RGR were low and moderate and ranged from 0.01 to 0.23 (Table 2). These heritabilities are higher than the heritabilities estimated by [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R16">16</xref>] with ranges 0.033 - 0.059 in growth traits. The estimates of heritability can be indicators for the selection procedure to improve the body weight in different ages. However, the variations in heritability estimates could be attributed to changes in estimation methods, as well as the role of diverse environmental factors. The moderate heritabilities found here for body weights could indicate that body weight improvement could be accomplished through selection [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">14</xref>].</p>
<p>Common little effect (c<sup>2</sup>) of body weight and relative growth rate were large as weaning then declined gradually as the rabbit grew older at 20 weeks of age (Table 2). There is evidence that the maternal and common environmental effects are a rapid reduction with over time, so the estimates are higher for growth at weaning than at the end of the fattening period in rabbits. These result in agreement with[
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19">19</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R20">20</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">14</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Heritabilities (h<sup>2</sup>), common little effect (c<sup>2</sup>) and error (e<sup>2</sup>), relative to phenotypic variance for body weights and relative growth rate (RGR) traits with their standard errors (&#x000b1;SE)</p>
</caption>

<table>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Body  weights at:</bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.19 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">0.61 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center">0.21&#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.21 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">0.58 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center">0.22 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.12 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">0.49 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.39 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.16 &#x000b1; 0.09</td>
<td align="center">0.39 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.45 &#x000b1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.10 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">0.36 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.54 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.14 &#x000b1; 0.10</td>
<td align="center">0.30 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center">0.56 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.24 &#x000b1; 0.01</td>
<td align="center">0.18 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.58 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.18 &#x000b1; 0.01</td>
<td align="center">0.25 &#x000b1; 0.03</td>
<td align="center">0.58 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20  weeks</td>
<td align="center">0.17 &#x000b1; 0.01</td>
<td align="center">0.27 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.55 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>RGR at age intervals:</bold></td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-6  week </td>
<td align="center">0.23 &#x000b1; 0.11 </td>
<td align="center">0.40 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center">0.37 &#x000b1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6-8  week</td>
<td align="center">0.20 &#x000b1; 0.09</td>
<td align="center">0.28 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center">0.52 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8-10  week</td>
<td align="center">0.18 &#x000b1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center">0.25 &#x000b1; 0.04</td>
<td align="center">0.57 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10-12 week</td>
<td align="center">0.06 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.25 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.68 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12-14  week</td>
<td align="center">0.01 &#x000b1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center">0.16 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.83 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14-16  week</td>
<td align="center">0.01 &#x000b1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center">0.15 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.84 &#x000b1; 0.05</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16-18  week</td>
<td align="center">0.09 &#x000b1; 0.11</td>
<td align="center">0.14 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center">0.77 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18-20  week</td>
<td align="center">0.02 &#x000b1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center">0.16 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center">0.82 &#x000b1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-20  week</td>
<td align="center">0.13 &#x000b1; 0.14</td>
<td align="center">0.59 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">0.28 &#x000b1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><title>3.3. Genetic groups and comparisons</title><p>The least-square means and standard errors for body weight and relative growth rate traits in purebreds and crossbreds are given inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>. Highly significant differences were observed among different genotypes for almost all traits. In general, the crossbred rabbits were somewhat higher than the purebreds and they are within the range observed by [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R21">21</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R22">22</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R23">23</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R25">25</xref>]. However, the new rabbit line resulting from the crossing program called Egy-line proved to be superior in all different body weights and was the highest compared to the parents. The crossbreed showed superiority in growth rate comparing to the parents except for RGR16-18 and RGR18-20. From these results, it is recommended to increase the new line (Egy-line) and use it as a line for producing meat.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p><b> </b>Least-square means body weights (g), relative growth rate (RGR) and their standard errors (S.E) in different genetic groups.</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Genetic groups</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>NXN</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>GXG</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>&#x00026;frac12;N&#x00026;frac12;G</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>&#x00026;frac12;N&#x00026;frac12;G X</bold><bold>&#x00026;frac12; N&#x00026;frac12;G</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Egy-line</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Traits</bold></td>
<td align="center" rowspan="2"><bold>Mean &#x000b1; SE</bold></td>
<td align="center" rowspan="2"><bold>Mean &#x000b1; SE</bold></td>
<td align="center" rowspan="2"><bold>Mean &#x000b1; SE</bold></td>
<td align="center" rowspan="2"><bold>Mean &#x000b1; SE</bold></td>
<td align="center" rowspan="2"><bold>Mean &#x000b1; SE</bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><bold>Body weights:</bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5 weeks</td>
<td align="center">444.0 &#x000b1;&#x00026;nbsp; 6.4<bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">456.7 &#x000b1; 8.9 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">499.0 &#x000b1; 9.8 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">441.4 &#x000b1; 9.4 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">489.0 &#x000b1; 13.5<bold><sup>ab</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6 weeks</td>
<td align="center">542.9 &#x000b1;&#x00026;nbsp; 7.2 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">576.2 &#x000b1; 10.2 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">616.9&#x00026;nbsp; &#x000b1; 11.2 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">575.2 &#x000b1; 11.3 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">655.1 &#x000b1; 15.2 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8 weeks</td>
<td align="center">713.7 &#x000b1;&#x00026;nbsp; 9.7 <bold><sup>d</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">804.8 &#x000b1; 14.5 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">872.5 &#x000b1; 16.3 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">850.2 &#x000b1; 15.2 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">949.6 &#x000b1; 20.9 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10 weeks</td>
<td align="center">959.8&#x00026;nbsp; 14.8 <bold><sup>d</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1086.0 &#x000b1; 18.4 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1152.4 &#x000b1; 21.2 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1175.7 &#x000b1; 19.0 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1262.8 &#x000b1; 26.2 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12 weeks</td>
<td align="center">1169.4 &#x000b1; 18.7<bold><sup>d</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1327.7 &#x000b1; 21.3 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1367.3 &#x000b1; 25.7 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1421.1 &#x000b1; 21.3 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1529.9 &#x000b1; 29.6 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14 weeks</td>
<td align="center">1388.2 &#x000b1; 22.7 <bold><sup>d</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1554.0 &#x000b1; 31.5 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1539.2 &#x000b1; 29.5 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1632.9 &#x000b1; 23.9 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1783.4 &#x000b1; 33.8<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16 weeks</td>
<td align="center">1541.6 &#x000b1; 30.3 <bold><sup>d</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1705.5 &#x000b1; 37.0 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1644.5 &#x000b1; 26.7 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1802.8 &#x000b1; 26.6 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1985.4 &#x000b1; 37.8<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18 weeks</td>
<td align="center">1744.4 &#x000b1; 35.3 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1893.8 &#x000b1; 40.2 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1801.7 &#x000b1; 37.2 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1980.0 &#x000b1; 28.7 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">2170.7 &#x000b1; 28.7<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20 weeks</td>
<td align="center">1982.6 &#x000b1; 41.4 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">2101.5 &#x000b1; 41.1 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1975.7 &#x000b1; 40.1 <bold>c</bold></td>
<td align="center">2170.1 &#x000b1; 44.0 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">2379.1 &#x000b1; 44.0<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><bold>RGR </bold>in intervals:</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-6 week</td>
<td align="center">20.2 &#x000b1; 0.40 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">23.5 &#x000b1; 0.56 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">21.1 &#x000b1; 0.62 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">29.9 &#x000b1; 0.62 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">28.1 &#x000b1; 0.83<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6-8 week</td>
<td align="center">27.9 &#x000b1; 0.61 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">31.8 &#x000b1; 0.91 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">30.4 &#x000b1; 1.0 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">39.2 &#x000b1; 0.96 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">36.3 &#x000b1; 1.3<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8-10 week</td>
<td align="center">26.9 &#x000b1; 0.64 <bold><sup>d</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">29.6 &#x000b1; 0.80 <bold><sup>ab</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">27.2 &#x000b1; 0.92 <bold><sup>cd</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">31.8 &#x000b1; 0.83<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">29.9 &#x000b1; 1.1<bold><sup>bc</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10-12 week</td>
<td align="center">18.5 &#x000b1; 0.48 <bold><sup>ab</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">19.3 &#x000b1; 0.55<bold><sup>ab</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">17.1 &#x000b1; 0.66 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">19.5 &#x000b1; 0.<bold><sup> a</sup></bold> 55<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">19.4 &#x000b1; 0.77<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12-14 week</td>
<td align="center">15.0 &#x000b1; 0.47 <bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">14.7 &#x000b1; 0.44 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">14.0 &#x000b1; 0.41 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">15.0 &#x000b1; 0.33 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">16.5 &#x000b1; 0.32<bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14-16 week</td>
<td align="center">11.8 &#x000b1; 0.47<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">11.5 &#x000b1; 0.46 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.5 &#x000b1; 041 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">11.8 &#x000b1; 0.33 <bold><sup>cb</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">13.02 &#x000b1; 0.38<bold><sup> b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16-18 week</td>
<td align="center">11.6 &#x000b1; 0.36<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.5 &#x000b1; 0.41 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.2 &#x000b1; 0.38 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.0 &#x000b1; 0.29<bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.9 &#x000b1; 0.41<bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18-20 week</td>
<td align="center">11.1 &#x000b1; 0.32<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.7 &#x000b1; 0.31 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.8 &#x000b1; 0.34 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.9 &#x000b1; 0.23 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.9 &#x000b1; 0.33<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-20 week</td>
<td align="center">120.2 &#x000b1; 1.7 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">127.7 &#x000b1; 1.7 <bold><sup>b</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">114.8 &#x000b1; 1.6 <bold><sup>c</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">132.1 &#x000b1;&#x00026;nbsp; 1.3<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">130.8 &#x000b1; 1.8<bold><sup>a</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><title>3.4. Comparing synthetic Egy-line with purebreds</title><p>Deviations of Egy-line from the parent purebreds (NMER and Gaint Flander) were positive and highly significant P &lt; 0.01) for all body weights at different ages (Table 4). The new synthetic line was superior for the NMER (N) in body weights and the largest superiorities were by 45.0, 112.2, 235.9, 303.0, 360.5, 395.2, 443.8, 426.3 and 396.5 at 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 weeks of age. Also, the same trends were observed for growth rate during different intervals except for growth rate during 10 to 12 weeks and 18 to 20 weeks (Table 4).</p>
<p>From these results, the Egy-line rabbits performed well for body weights and growth rates. Egy-line is characterized by rapid growth in obtaining hybrid rabbits and it involves in a crossbreeding program with other local rabbits under Egyptian conditions. Many researchers have worked on the crossing between breeds, and their results are almost consistent with the results of this study. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>] established the synthetic line between the V line and Baladi Red (BR) breed rabbits and named APRI-line that appears intermediate between the founders in growth traits when raised in environmental conditions of experiments in the Delta-Egypt. In these conditions, the APRI was a better alternative for the BR breed but worse than V line and they suggested more studies are needed to know the performance of APRI-line under different Egyptian regions&#x26;#x02019; conditions. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>] reported that synthetic rabbit line by crossing V-line and Saudi Gabali breed rabbits as a project to be convenient in hot climate areas of Saudia. So, these synthetic lines could be used in commercial farms.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> The improvement in synthetic line, (Egy-line) comparing to purebreds for body weights and relative growth traits.</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left"><bold>&#x00026;nbsp;</bold></th>
<th align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Improvement in</bold><bold> Egy-line </bold><bold>relative to</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Traits</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>NMER (N)</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>Ganit Flander (</bold><bold>G)</bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Body weights at&#x00026;nbsp; age:</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>Contrast </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>Contrast </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5 weeks</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;&#x00026;nbsp; 45.0 &#x000b1; 14.9 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">32.0 &#x000b1; 16.2 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6 weeks</td>
<td align="center">112.2 &#x000b1; 16.8<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">78..9 &#x000b1; 18.3<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8 weeks</td>
<td align="center">235.9 &#x000b1; 23.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">144.8 &#x000b1; 25.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10 weeks</td>
<td align="center">303.0 &#x000b1; 30.1<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">176.8 &#x000b1; 32.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12 weeks</td>
<td align="center">360.5 &#x000b1; 34.9<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">202.2 &#x000b1; 36.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14 weeks</td>
<td align="center">395.2 &#x000b1; 40.7 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">229.4 &#x000b1; 46.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16 weeks</td>
<td align="center">443.8 &#x000b1; 48.8 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">279.9 &#x000b1; 52.9<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18 weeks</td>
<td align="center">426.3 &#x000b1; 45.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">276.9 &#x000b1; 49.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20 weeks</td>
<td align="center">396.5 &#x000b1; 60.7 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">277.6 &#x000b1; 60.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="3">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>RGR at age intervals:</bold></td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-6 week</td>
<td align="center">7.9 &#x000b1; 0.92 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">4.6 &#x000b1; 1.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6-8 weeks</td>
<td align="center">8.4 &#x000b1; 1.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">4.5 &#x000b1; 1.6<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8-10 week</td>
<td align="center">3.0 &#x000b1; 1.6<bold><sup>*</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">0.30 &#x000b1; 1.9<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10-12 week</td>
<td align="center">0.90 &#x000b1; 0.91<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">0.10 &#x000b1; 0.95<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12-14 week</td>
<td align="center">1.5 &#x000b1; 0.57 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1.8 &#x000b1;  0.54<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14-16 week</td>
<td align="center">1.2 &#x000b1;0.60<bold><sup>*</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1.5 &#x000b1; 0.59<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16-18 week</td>
<td align="center">-1.7 &#x000b1; 0.55**</td>
<td align="center">-0.60 &#x000b1; 0.58ns</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18-20 week</td>
<td align="center">-0.20 &#x000b1; 0.46 <sup>ns</sup></td>
<td align="center">1.2 &#x000b1; 0.45 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-20 week</td>
<td align="center">10.6 &#x000b1;2.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">3.1 &#x000b1; 2.4 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="3">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><title>3.5. Direct (G<SUP>I</SUP>) and maternal additive (G<SUP>M</SUP>) effects</title><p>Estimates of direct additive effect were positive and highly significant P &lt; 0.01) for all body weights at different ages, favoring Ganit Flander and heavier by 45, 112.2, 235.9, 303, 360.5, 395.2, 443.8, 426.3, and  396.5g at 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 weeks of age comparing with NMER rabbits (Table 5). The obtained results for most relative growth traits during different intervals except between 10 to 12 and 18 to 20 weeks, were non-significant and between16 to 18 were negative and significant. </p>
<p>As well Ganit Flander was highly significant and heavier in maternal additive effects by 32, 78.9, 144.8, 176.8, 202.2, 229.4, 279.9, 276.9 and 277.6 g at 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 weeks of age comparing with NMER rabbits. Also, Ganit Flander was highly significant and heavier in maternal additive effects for most growth rates during different intervals. These results are in agreement with many researchers, [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R26">26</xref>]noted that direct and maternal additive effects on post-weaning body weight traits were significant (P&lt;0.01) and favouring V-line rabbits comparing Baladi Black ones. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R27">27</xref>]reported that Gabali breed was superior in direct and maternal additive effects over the V line for body weights at 8 and 12 weeks and daily gains in 4-8 and 8-12 week. They reported that percentages of these estimates relative to the averages of Gabali and V line were 5.2, 6.6, 5.3, 11.1 and 21.3% for W4, W8, W12, DG4-8, and DG8-12, respectively.</p>
<p>Likewise [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">7</xref>] found that the superiority of the Gabali breed in growth was over the V line while the superiority in prolificacy exhibited in V line. So, crossing between Gabali and V line was carried out to appear the beneficial complementarity in the global performance and producing synthesized line named Moshtohor. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>] reported that the differences in direct additive effects among the V-line and Baladi Red rabbits were in favor of V line rabbits for reaching 15.0% (76 g) at 4 weeks and 13.3% (195 g) at 12 weeks and estimates of daily gains reaching 35.7% (7.19 g/d) in the interval of 10&#x26;#x02013;12 weeks. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>] reported that most estimates of direct genetic effects for body weights and daily gains were in favour of V-line rabbits, and differences in direct and maternal genetic effects among the two lines were moderate and reaching 13.1% for daily gain in the interval of 10&#x26;#x02013;12 weeks. For direct genetic effects, V line rabbits were significantly heavier by 28.6, 31.1, 62.6, 114.8, and 189.4 g than the Saudi Gabali at 4, 6, 8, and 10 and 12 weeks of age, respectively[
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>].</p>
<p>Also, V line rabbits were significantly heavier in maternal genetic effects by 43.8, 46.4, 70.9, 78.5 and 81.6 g than Saudi Gabali at the same ages. Furthermore, both direct and maternal genetic effects were significantly heavier in daily gain weight by values ranging from 0.9 to 3.37 g at all age intervals studied [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R25">25</xref>] reported that the direct genetic effect of New Zealand White (NZW) was positive for all growth traits studied while the body weight (BW) at 8<sup>th</sup> week, growth rate at 4-6 and at 6-8 weeks of age were negative, their values -37g,-64g,-1.62% and-4.71%, respectively. The estimates for Californian (Cal) breed were negative for all growth traits with the exception of BW at 4<sup>th</sup> week and growth rate at 8-10, and at 10-12 weeks of age. Rex (RR) rabbits showed nearly equal distribution of negative and positives estimates of direct genetic effect among traits under investigation. This study reported that additive sire effect is higher in NZW rabbit for weaning and post-weaning growth traits and it is better to be used as sire breed than Cal and RR.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p><b>Table 5</b><b>.</b> Direct (G<sup><b>I</b></sup>) and maternal (G<sup><b>M</b></sup>) additive effects and their standard errors (&#x00026;#177; SE) for body weights and relative growth rate (RGR).</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left"><bold>Traits</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Direct </bold><bold>additive (G<sup>I</sup>)</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Maternal additive</bold><bold>(G<sup>M</sup>)</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Body weights:</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>Units </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>G<sup>I</sup></bold><bold>%</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>Units </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>G<sup>M</sup></bold><bold>%</bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="5">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5 weeks</td>
<td align="center">12.7 &#x000b1;&#x00026;nbsp;  6.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">2.8</td>
<td align="center">31.1 &#x000b1; 9.1<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">6.9</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6 weeks</td>
<td align="center">33.3 &#x000b1; 12.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">6.0</td>
<td align="center">52.1 &#x000b1; 10.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8 weeks</td>
<td align="center">91.1 &#x000b1; 17.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">12.0</td>
<td align="center">122.6 &#x000b1; 14.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">16.1</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10 weeks</td>
<td align="center">126.2 &#x000b1; 23.6<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">12.3</td>
<td align="center">153.5 &#x000b1; 20.3<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">15.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12 weeks</td>
<td align="center">158.3 &#x000b1; 28.1 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">12.7</td>
<td align="center">171.2 &#x000b1; 24.6 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">13.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14 weeks</td>
<td align="center">165.8 &#x000b1; 38.8<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">11.3</td>
<td align="center">155.7 &#x000b1; 31.3<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.6</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16 weeks</td>
<td align="center">163.9 &#x000b1; 47.8<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.1</td>
<td align="center">105.1 &#x000b1; 37.1 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">6.5</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18 weeks</td>
<td align="center">149.4 &#x000b1; 53.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.0</td>
<td align="center">69.0 &#x000b1; 44.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">3.8</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20 weeks</td>
<td align="center">118.9 &#x000b1; 58.6<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">5.8</td>
<td align="center">28.3 &#x000b1; 50.5<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1.4</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="5">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>RGR at&#x00026;nbsp;  age intervals</bold></td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-6 week</td>
<td align="center">3.3 &#x000b1; 0.69<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">15.1</td>
<td align="center">2.2 &#x000b1; 0.58<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.1</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6-8 weeks</td>
<td align="center">3.9 &#x000b1; 1.1<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">13.1</td>
<td align="center">3.3 &#x000b1; 0.91<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">11.1</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8-10 week</td>
<td align="center">2.7 &#x000b1; 1.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.6</td>
<td align="center">1.7 &#x000b1; 0.88<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">6.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10-12 week</td>
<td align="center">0.80 &#x000b1; 0.73<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">4.2</td>
<td align="center">-0.11 &#x000b1; 0.64 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-0.58</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12-14 week</td>
<td align="center">-0.30 &#x000b1; 0.64<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-2.0</td>
<td align="center">-1.0 &#x000b1;  0.55<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14-16 week</td>
<td align="center">-0.29 &#x000b1; 0.65 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-2.5</td>
<td align="center">1.1&#x000b1; 0.56 <bold><sup>*</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.4</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16-18 week</td>
<td align="center">-1.1 &#x000b1; 0.54<bold><sup>*</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-10.0</td>
<td align="center">-1.8 &#x000b1; 0.45 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-16.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18-20 week</td>
<td align="center">-1.4 &#x000b1; 0.45<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-13.5</td>
<td align="center">-1.4 &#x000b1; 0.38<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-13.5</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-20 week</td>
<td align="center">7.5 &#x000b1;&#x00026;nbsp; 2.3<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">6.1</td>
<td align="center">0.60 &#x000b1; 2.0<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">0.48</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="5">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><title>3.6. Direct (HI ) and maternal heterosis (HM ) effects</title><p>Estimates of direct heterosis effect for most the body weights were positive and highly significant (P &lt; 0.01), and percentages of direct heterosis increased generally with the advance of age (Table 6). Direct heterosis effects for mostly RGR during different intervals were negative and not significant.</p>
<p>Generally, estimates of maternal heterosis for body weight were positive and highly significant (P &lt; 0.01), and percentages of maternal heterosis ranged from 3.9 to 16.0%. Maternal heterosis for growth rates from 5 to 6, 8 to 10, and 10 to 12weeks was positive and highly significant while the restated of the periods they were between negative, positive and significant. These results are within the scope of the results obtained by many researchers, such as [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R26">26</xref>], who reported that direct and maternal heterosis effects on post-weaning body weight traits were significant. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R27">27</xref>]noted that estimates of direct heterosis effects were positive and significant for several of the studied traits and percentages were 6.9, 3.6, 5.4, 9.7, and 6.1% for BW4, BW8, BW12, DG4-8 and DG8-12, respectively. Percentages of maternal heterosis for the same traits were the same trends for BW4 and DG4-8. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>] observed that the estimates of direct heterosis were positive and significant, ranging from 4.9 to 16.7% for body weights and 14.4 to 29.5% for daily gains, while the estimates for maternal heterosis were mainly negative, ranging from -4.5 to -5.2% for body weights and from 20.6 to -36.9% for daily gains. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>] reported that direct heterosis for body weights and daily gains were significantly positive and ranged from 4.5 to 9.6%. Estimates of maternal heterosis were mainly significantly positive and ranged from 1.5 to 6.0%. Estimates of direct (maternal) heterosis in grams were 29.1 (34.3), 61.4 (17.5), 69.7 (36.1), 98.6 (52.9), and 124.4 (74.8) for body weights at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of age, respectively. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R25">25</xref>] noted that strong individual heterosis was estimated for NZW X Cal crossbreds for all body weights, especially at 6<sup>th</sup>week of age (20.24%) and most of BWG, especially at 4-6 weeks of age (25.89%). However, negative estimates were recorded for most of RGR. In contrast, NZW &#x26;#x000d7; Cal and RR crossbreeding, they showed negative estimates for all studied traits at most ages and age intervals [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R25">25</xref>]. Through the results of this study and other research, it is possible to improve growth traits by crossing.</p>
<title>3.7. Direct recombination effects (RI)</title><p>Direct recombination effects (RI) for most bodyweight were positive and highly significantly exclude wight at 5 and 6 weeks (Table 6). Also, RI for growth rates during different intervals exclude during from 16 to 18 and from 18 to 20 were not significant (Table 6). These results are consistent with [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R28">28</xref>], who studied the RI for body weight at 4, 8, 12, and 14 weeks and daily gain during intervals 4 -14. on the contrary, the results are in finding of [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R29">29</xref>] who reported that RI loss was negative and highly significant for body weights (from -14.72 g to 493.51 g). [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>] observed that RI was not significant. They suggested that these estimates gave the impression to indicate that the crossbred dams, including the V-line genes, could be effective in improving growth performance after weaning by crossing the V-line with the native rabbits.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Direct (H<sup> I</sup>) and maternal (H <sup>M</sup>) heterosis and direct recombination effect and their standard errors (&#x000b1;SE) for growth traits.</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Traits</bold></th>
<th align="center" colspan="3"><bold>Direct </bold><bold>heterosis</bold><bold>(H<sup>I</sup>  )</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="center" colspan="3"><bold>Maternal heterosis</bold><bold>(H<sup>M</sup> )</bold><bold></bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Recombination</bold><bold></bold><bold>(R<sup>I</sup>)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Body weights:</bold></td>
<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Units </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>H <sup>I</sup></bold><bold>%</bold></td>
<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Units </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>H <sup>M</sup></bold><bold>%</bold></td>
<td align="center" colspan="4"><bold>Units </bold><bold>&#x000b1; SE</bold><bold></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="10">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-12.4 &#x000b1; 10.2<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-2.8</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">48.7 &#x000b1; 10.9 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.8</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">-35.5 &#x000b1; 19.1 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">57.4 &#x000b1; 12.8<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">10.3</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">21.9 &#x000b1; 12.1<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">3.9</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">30.8 &#x000b1; 22.2<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">113.2 &#x000b1; 18.5 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">14.9</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">100.1 &#x000b1; 16.4<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">13.2</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">137.4 &#x000b1; 30.7<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">129.5 &#x000b1; 24.3<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">12.7</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">163.7 &#x000b1; 21.1 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">16.0</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">236.1 &#x000b1; 39.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">118.8 &#x000b1; 29.3<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">192.5 &#x000b1; 24.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">15.4</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">300.6 &#x000b1; 45.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">68.1 &#x000b1; 35.3 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">4.6</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">194.0 &#x000b1; 28.2 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">13.2</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">355.8 &#x000b1; 52.6<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">20.9 &#x000b1; 36.8 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1.3</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">229.4 &#x000b1; 32.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">14.1</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">458.5 &#x000b1; 56.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-17.4 &#x000b1; 45.8<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-0.96</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">225.7 &#x000b1; 36.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">12.4</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">529.9 &#x000b1; 61.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-66.9 &#x000b1; 49.7<bold><sup> ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-3.3</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">252.9 &#x000b1; 49.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">12.4</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">532.1 &#x000b1; 61.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>RGR at age intervals:</bold></td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-6 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;&#x00026;nbsp;  -0.75 &#x000b1; 0.70 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-3.4</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">6.3 &#x000b1; 0.66 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">28.8</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">11.7&#x00026;nbsp; &#x000b1; 1.2 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6-8 weeks</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;  0.54 &#x000b1;  1.1<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">1.8</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">10.0 &#x000b1; 1.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">33.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">16.1 &#x000b1; 1.8<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8-10 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-1.0 &#x000b1; 1.1<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-3.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">4.1 &#x000b1; 0.92<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">14.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">6.8 &#x000b1; 1.7<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10-12 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;  -1.8 &#x000b1;  0.75<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-9.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x000b1;  1.1&#x000b1;.62 <sup>ns</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.8</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">2.9 &#x000b1; 1.2<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12-14 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;&#x00026;nbsp;  -0.81 &#x000b1;  0.52 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-5.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">0.51 &#x000b1;  0.43<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">3.4</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">2.6 &#x000b1;  0.69 <bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14-16 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-1.2 &#x000b1; 0.52 <bold><sup>*</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-10.3</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">0.52 &#x000b1; 0.43<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">4.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">2.5 &#x000b1; 0.72<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16-18 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;  1.9 &#x000b1;  0.47<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">17.2</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-0.74 &#x000b1; 0.37<bold><sup>*</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-6.7</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">-0.34 &#x000b1; 0.67<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18-20 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">&#x00026;nbsp;&#x00026;nbsp;  -0.59 &#x000b1;  0.37 <bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-5.7</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-0.48 &#x000b1; 0.30<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-4.6</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">0.25 &#x000b1; 0.53<bold><sup>ns</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5-20 week</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">-9.2 &#x000b1; 2.0<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">-7.4</td>
<td align="center" colspan="2">11.7 &#x000b1; 1.6<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center">9.5</td>
<td align="center" colspan="3">24.6 &#x000b1; 2.9<bold><sup>**</sup></bold></td>
<td align="center"></td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusions</title><p>Growth traits were affected by direct genetic effects and the maternal effects were less important. By heterosis, the new line (Egy-line)was synthesized, that has proven its superiority and performance well in all different body weights and most growth rates compared to the parents. Success combining the NMER as native genetic resource and the high productive breeds or line for forming a synthetic line could encourage more uses for NMER in crossbreeding schemes to synthetic line could perform well in Egypt. 1. Subsection.</p>
<p></p>
<p><bold>Author Contributions:</bold> El-Sayed Abdel-Kafy contributed to project administration, Conceptual-ization, and editing; Amira S. El-Deighadi contributed to formal analysis and writing-review; Hoda Shabaan contributed to data curation and methodology; Wael H., Ali contributed in investigation and data curation; Zain El-Abdeen A. Sabra contributed in software and validation and A. Farid contributed in methodology and project administration.</p>
<p><bold>Funding: </bold>This research was conducted within the framework of the project &#x26;#x0201c;Crossing NMER with Giant Flander and V line rabbits&#x26;#x0201d;, which was funded by Animal Production Research Institute (APRI) in Egypt under code no. 020203429.</p>
<p><bold>Acknowledgments:</bold> The authors greatly appreciate the help of staffs in the Rabbit farm, Sakha - Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, which belongs to APRI for their support in this research.</p>
<p><bold>Conflicts of Interest: </bold>The authors declare no con&#x26;#x0fb02;ict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.</p>
</sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      
<ref id="R1">
<label>[1]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Badawy AG (1975) Rabbit Raising. Central Administration for Agricultural Culture, Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt (2nd Edition, In Arabic), pp. 75.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R2">
<label>[2]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khalil MH (2002) TheBaladi Rabbits (Egypt). In: Khalil MH, Baselga M (Eds.) Rabbit genetic resources in Mediterranean countries. Options M&#x000e9;diterran&#x000e9;nnes, Series B, Ciheam, Zaragoza, Spain, pp. 38-50.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R3">
<label>[3]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Imam A R Ahmed Mostafa, Dorina M, Mohamed S, Ayman A, Monica M. Rabbits Meat Production in Egypt and its Impact on Food Security, Small Holders Income and Economy. Agri Res&#x00026; Tech: Open Access J. 2020; 23(5): 556251.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R4">
<label>[4]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Brun J.M., Theau-Cl&#x000e9;ment M., Bolet G., 2002. Evidence for heterosis and maternal effects on rabbit semen characteristics. Anim. Res., 51, 433-442.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R5">
<label>[5]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abou Khadiga G.S.M., 2004. Performance of the Spanish synthetic line (V) and the local Baladi Black rabbits and their crosses under Egyptian conditions. M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafr El-Sheikh, Tanta University, Egypt.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R6">
<label>[6]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khalil M.H., Hermes I.H., Mehaia M.A., Al-Homidan A.H., Al-Sobayil K.A., Al-Karaawy, A.A. 2005. Production of purebred and crossbred parents of rabbits to be distributed to breeders in Al-Qassim region. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. King Abdulaziz city for Science and Technology General Directorate of Research Grants Programs. Al-Qassim University, Final Technical Report. ARP, 18-62.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R7">
<label>[7]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Iraqi M.M., Baselga M., Kalil M.H., Afifi E.A., Garc&#x000ed;a M.L., 2009. Line Moshtohor (Egypt). In Khalil M.H., Baselga, M. (Eds). Rabbit Genetic Resources in Mediterranean Countries. Options Mediterranean's, SeriesB, N 38&#x000ba;, Spain, http://www.iamz.ciheam.org/medrabbit/docs/moshtohor.pdf
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R8">
<label>[8]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Galal ESE, Khalil MH (1994) Development of rabbit industry in Egypt. CIHEAM - Options Mediterraneennes, pp. 43-53.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R9">
<label>[9]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abel-Kafy EM, Shabaan HMA, Azoz AAA, El-Sayed AFM, Abdel-Latif AM (2011) Descriptions of native rabbit breeds in Middel-Egypt. Proceedings of the 4th Egyptian Conference of Rabbit Science, Giza, Egypt, pp: 1-14.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R10">
<label>[10]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Broody S (1945). Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Pub Crop NY, USA.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R11">
<label>[11]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Boldmann, K. G.; Kriese, L. A.; Van Tassell, C. P.; Kachman, S. D. (1995). A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariance [DRAFT]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, USA.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R12">
<label>[12]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wolf J., 1996. User's manual for the software package (C B E). Version 4.0. A universal program for estimating crossbreeding effects. Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Genetics and Biometrics, PrahaUh&#x000d5; &#x000ed; n&#x000e7;ves, Czech Re-public.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R13">
<label>[13]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dickerson G.E. 1969. Experimental approaches in utilizing breed resources.Anim. Breed. Abstr., 37, 191-202.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R14">
<label>[14]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">El-Deihadi S. Amira and M. K. Ibrahim, 2017. Genetic aspects of post-weaning for growth traits in New Zealand White rabbits. Egyptian Journal of Rabbit Science, 27 (2): 507-521.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R15">
<label>[15]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khalil. H.H.; Afifi, E.A., and Owen, J.B., 1987. A genetic analysis of body weight traits in young Bauscat and Giza White rabbits. Anim. Prod., 45; 135-144.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R16">
<label>[16]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ezzeroug R., R. Belabbas, M. Jos&#x000e9; Argente, A. Berbar, S.Diss, Z. Boudjella, D. Talaziza, N. Boudahdir, and M. D. Garc&#x000ed;a. 2020. Genetic correlations for reproductive and growth traits in rabbits. Home Canadian Journal of Animal Science Volume 100, No: 2,
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R17">
<label>[17]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Youssef, Y.K.Baselga, M., Khalil, M.H. Omara, M.E.,Garc&#x000ed;a, M.L., 2009. Crossbreeding effects for post-weaning growth traits in a project of Spanish V-line with Baladi Red rabbits in Egypt. Livestock Science, Elsevier 122: 302-30.Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D. Title of the article. Abbreviated Journal NameYear, Volume, page range.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R18">
<label>[18]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Behiry, F. Fatamh, 2014. Genetic study for somebody measurements and its relationship with some productive traits in rabbits. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Tanta Univ., Egypt.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R19">
<label>[19]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Garc&#x000ed;a M.L. and Baselga M. 2002. Estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits using a cryopreserved control population. Livest. Prod. Sci. 74: 45-53.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R20">
<label>[20]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Youssef, Y.K., Baselga, M., Khalil, M.H., Gad-Alla, S., Garc&#x000ed;a, M.L., 2008. Evaluation of litter traits in a crossing project of Spanish V-line and Baladi Red rabbits in Egypt. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20(9), Article 13.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R21">
<label>[21]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Maj D, Bieniek J, &#x00141;apa P, Ina S., (2009). The effect of crossing New Zealand White with Californian rabbits on growth and slaughter traits. Archive animal breeding, 52: 205-211.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R22">
<label>[22]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">El-Bayomi, Kh.; M.; El-Tarabany, MS.; Abdel-Hamid TM, 2012. Estimation of heterosis and combining ability for some weaning and post-weaning traits in three different breeds of rabbits. Journal of American Science, 8: 282-288.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R23">
<label>[23]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Akinsola OM, Nwagu BI, Orunmuyi M, Iyeghe-Erakpotobor GT, Abanikannda OTF, 2014. Factors influencing litter traits and body weight at pre-weaning ages among temperate rabbit breeds in the tropical conditions of Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Microbiology, 3: 14-18.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R24">
<label>[24]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khalil M.H. and Al-Homidan A.H., 2014. Genetic evaluation for growth traits and thermo tolerance parameters in syn-thesizing program of new rabbits International Conference On Biotechnology Applications In Agriculture, Benha Univer-sity, Moshtohor and Hurghada, 8-11, Egypt.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R25">
<label>[25]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abdel-Hamid, T., M., 2015. Crossbreeding parameters for growth traits in a complete three breedsdiallel cross design of rabbits in Egypt. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 2(2): 120-127.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R26">
<label>[26]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abou-KhadigaG ,Saleh K., Nofal R. ndBaselga, 2008. Genetic evaluation of growth traits in a crossbreeding experiment involving line v and baladi black rabbits in Egypt.9thWorld Rabbit Congress - June 10-13. - Verona - Italy.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R27">
<label>[27]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Iraqi M.M., Afifi E.A., Baselga M., Khalil M.H., Garc&#x000ed;a M.L. 2008. Additive and heterotic components for post-weaning Growth traits in a crossing project of V-line with Gabali rabbits in Egypt. In proceedings of 9thWorld Rabbit Congress,10-13 June 2008, Verona, Italy, Issued in World Rabbit Science.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R28">
<label>[28]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Youssef Y.M.K., 2004. Heritability and common litter effects estimated by an Animal Model for post-weaning growth traits in New Zealand White and Baladi Red rabbits. Egyptian J. of Rabbit Sci., 24 (1), 205-216.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R29">
<label>[29]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Majzlik I, Zavadilova, L, Mach, K, 2007. Crossbreeding parameters for growth performance of broiler rabbits. Scienti-aAgriculturaeBohemica, agris.fao.org, http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=CZ2007000320.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>