﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJC</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Online Journal of Chemistry</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2770-1913</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub"></issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Science Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31586/ojc.2022.263</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJC-263</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>
          Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Study of the Adsorption of Pb (II) and Cd (II) Ions from Aqueous Solution by the Leaves Biomass of Guava and Cashew Plants
        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pindiga</surname>
<given-names>Nasiru Yahaya</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="cr1" ref-type="corresp">*</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walid</surname>
<given-names>Abubakar Haruna</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdullahi</surname>
<given-names>Abdullateef Olalekan</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mohammad</surname>
<given-names>Adamu Baba</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<aff id="af1"><label>1</label> Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Gombe State University Gombe, Gombe State. PMB 127, Nigeria</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1">
<label>*</label>Corresponding author at: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Gombe State University Gombe, Gombe State. PMB 127, Nigeria
</corresp>
</author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>15</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>15</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>15</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>15</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="pub">
          <day>15</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#xa9; Copyright 2022 by authors and Trend Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        The plant leaves used as adsorbent in this study were Guava plant leaves (GPL) and Cashew plant leaves (CPL). The samples were collected within Gombe State. Batch adsorption method was used in determining the adsorption process. Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scan-ning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) were used for the characterization. The results show promising signs as they were in agreement with most literatures; various per-centage removals were obtained from Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (GPL and CPL) at optimum conditions. The equilibrium data fitted well with both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Langmuir mod-el fitted well for Pb<sup>2+</sup> (CPL) with R<sup>2</sup> value (0.9855) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> for (GPL and CPL) with R<sup>2 </sup>values (0.9945 and 0.9948) while Pb<sup>2+</sup> (GPL) with correlation coefficient at 0.9116 best fits well with Freundlich isotherm model. Pseudo first order and second order were used in testing the kinetics study from which pseudo second order best fitted better than that of the first order kinetics. The thermodynamic study shows that &#x00394;G is negative in most cases except for Cd<sup>2+</sup> (GPL) where &#x00394;G is positive. Whereas &#x00394;H and &#x00394;S are positive in some cases showing an endothermic and spontane-ous adsorption processes respectively, as well as negative in some. Based on this study, GPL and CPL could be used as a natural adsorbent to remove Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> heavy metals from wastewater and environment due to their high removal efficiencies.
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd-group><kwd>Adsorption; Kinetic</kwd>
<kwd>Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Study; Leaves Biomass of Guava and Cashew plants</kwd>
</kwd-group>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title><p>Adsorption is one of the most favorable techniques applied for water treatment, mainly because it is suitable for low concentration of metal ions and cost effective [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref>]. Adsorption is a physico-chemical process where the substance called adsorbate accumulates at the interface of solid called adsorbent [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>]. Activated carbon is commonly used as an adsorbent for water treatment because it has porous structure and large surface area [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref>]. In spite of its great physical properties, the use of activated carbon is restricted to its high cost [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref>]. Therefore, alternative adsorbents derived from low-cost materials should be introduced to minimize the operating cost particularly in developing countries.</p>
</sec><sec id="sec2">
<title>Experimental</title><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>The leaves biomass of GPL and CPL were collected within Gombe metropolis, Gombe State. All chemicals used were of analytical grade. Stock solution (1000mg/L) was prepared from which the experiment was conducted by dissolving the salts Pb (NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and CdCl<sub>2 </sub>in distilled water, HCl and NaOH solution were for pH adjustments. From the stock solution prepared, initial concentration of each metal was prepared and concentrations were analyzed using Atomic Adsorption Spectrophotometer (AAS).</p>
<title>2.2. Adsorbent Preparation </title><p>The leaf biomass were washed with ordinary water thoroughly and with distilled water in order to remove impurities and debris present, after which the samples were allowed to dry for about 8 days to completely remove moisture content. These dried samples were then grounded to a fine powder and then sieve with a micrometer sieve of 150&#x26;#x003bc;m. The sieved powder was stored and used for batch experiments.</p>
<title>2.3. Characterization of the Sample</title><title>2.3.1. Fourier Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy (FT-IR)</title><p>FT-IR was used to give a qualitative analysis of the main chemical functional groups present on the biomass and responsible for the adsorption processes which was adopted by Wassila <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>]. The analyses were carried out using Perkin Elmer Spectrophotometer with model number 10.03.09. </p>
<title>2.3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)</title><p>The Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was implemented to examine the physical structure change using SEM model Phenom ProX, by phenom World Einhoven, Netherland. Samples were placed on double adhesive which was on a sample stub, coated with a sputter coater by quorum technologies model Q150R, with 5nm of gold. Thereafter it was taken to the chamber of the SEM machine where it was viewed via NaVCaM for focusing and little adjustment, it was then transferred to SEM mode where the focused and brightness contrasting was automatically adjusted. </p>
<title>2.3.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)</title><p>XRD was used for the characterization crystalline materials and also provides information on structural elucidation, phases, preferred crystal orientations (texture), and other structural parameters, such as average grain size, strain, and crystal defects. The analyzed materials were finely grounded, homogenized, and average bulk compositions were determined. The powdered samples were then prepared using the sample preparation block and compressed in the flat sample holder to create a flat, smooth surface that waslater mounted on the sample stage in the XRD cabinet. The samples were analyzed using the reflection transmission spinner stage using the Theta-Theta settings. The 2&#x26;#x003b8; starting position is 4 degrees and ends at 75 degrees with a &#x26;#x003b8; step of 0.026261 at 8.67 seconds per step.</p>
<title>2.4. Batch adsorption experiment </title><p>Batch adsorption experiments were carried out by varying contact time, initial concentration, pH, temperature and adsorbent dose. Batch adsorption experiment process carried out in contact with the aqueous solution containing Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> in a 250ml conical flask. The flask was agitated in an orbital shaker at a constant speed of 150 rpm. The adsorption process was conducted under the following conditions; initial concentration (50-1000mg/L), contact time (15-60mins), adsorbent dose (0.2-1g), pH (2-10) and temperature (25-60<sup> </sup><sup>o</sup>c) which were then varied to study their effects on metal ion.</p>
<p>After equilibrium was reached, each sample was filtered using Whatman 41 filter paper and analyzed using Atomic Adsorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). Percentage removal and amount of metal ion adsorbed at equilibrium were calculated using the formulas below;</p>
<p>Percentage Removal: E% = (Ci &#x26;#x02013; Ce)/Ci x 100</p>
<p>Amount Adsorbed: qe = (Co &#x26;#x02013; Ce) v/w</p>
<p>Where; Ci = the initial concentration of the metal solution (mg/L),</p>
<p>Ce = the equilibrium concentration of the metal solution (mg/L),</p>
<p>C<sub>0</sub> = the initial concentration of the sorbate.</p>
<p>W = the mass of adsorbent (g)</p>
<p>V = the volume of the solution (L)</p>
<title>2.5. Adsorption Isotherm</title><p>Isotherms curves in expressing the difference in amount of gas adsorbed by adsorbent with pressure at constant temperature, most commonly used isotherms are Freundlich and Langmuir Isotherm. The Freundlich isotherm model deals with adsorption at multilayer heterogeneous surfaces [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref>] while the Langmuir isotherm model assumes all sites on adsorbents have equal energy [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R18">18</xref>]. Linear form of Freundlich isotherm model is expressed as:</p>
<p>Where K<sub>F</sub> (mg/g) and n are the Freundlich constants related to adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively. A linear plot of q<sub>e</sub> against log C<sub>e</sub> will give K<sub>F</sub> and n values while that of Langmuir Isotherm can be written in the following linear form </p>
<p>Where Ce (mg/l) is the concentration of adsorbent at equilibrium, K<sub>L</sub> (mg/l) is the Langmuir constant related to the adsorption energy and qm (mg/g) is the adsorption capacity. The adsorption capacity can be correlated with the variation of the surface area and porosity of the adsorbent. Higher surface area and pore volume resulted in higher adsorption capacity [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19">19</xref>]. The essential characteristics of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed by a dimensionless constant called the equilibrium parameter, R<sub>L</sub> [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R20">20</xref>].</p>
<title>2.6. Adsorption Kinetics</title><p>Is the measure of adsorption with respect to time at constant pressure and concentration. </p>
<p>Pseudo First order equation of Lagergren [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R21">21</xref>] is given as follows: </p>
<p>Where qt and qe are the amounts adsorbed at time t and equilibrium (mg/g), respectively, and k1 is the pseudo first-order rate constant for the adsorption process (1/min). The linear graph of ln (qe &#x26;#x02212; qt) vs. t shows the applicability of first order kinetic.</p>
<p>For Pseudo Second Order Kinetics the chemisorption kinetic rate equation is expressed as follows:</p>
<p>Where k<sub>2</sub> is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-second order equation (g/mg min). The linearity of t / qt vs t suggests the best fitted with pseudo-second order kinetic [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R22">22</xref>].</p>
<title>2.7. Thermodynamic Study</title><p>The free energy of adsorption (&#x26;#x02206;G&#x26;#x000b0;) can be related with Langmuir adsorption constant [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R23">23</xref>] by the following equation:</p>
<p>Thus, a plot of lnK<sub>L</sub> versus 1/T should be a straight line. &#x26;#x02206;H&#x26;#x000b0; and &#x26;#x02206;S&#x26;#x000b0; values were obtained from the slope and intercept of this plot, respectively.</p>
</sec><sec id="sec3">
<title>Results and Discussion</title><title>3.1. Characterization of the Adsorbent</title><p>The FT-IR spectra of GPL and CPL adsorbent are shown inFigure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figfigure 1"> figure 1</xref> and 2 respectively.Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"> 1</xref>, FT-IR spectra shows abroad bend at 3444.06cm<sup>-1</sup> corresponding to O-H stretch, due to the adsorbed water and the presence of hydroxyl group (OH) of alcohol, carboxylic acids and phenols, widely found in lignocellulosic materials [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>]. 2923 cm<sup>-1</sup> is attributed to C-H stretch, stretch at 1633.74cm<sup>-1</sup> corresponding to C=C group. Peak at 1456.98 cm<sup>-1</sup> is attributed to C-C band. The band at 1032.94 cm<sup>-1</sup> is assigned to C-O stretch [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R25">25</xref>].</p>
<fig id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>FT-IR spectrum of GPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.001" />
</fig><p>FT-IR spectrums ofFigure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"> 2</xref> for CPL shows a strong and broad peak which were originated from O-H stretch is at 3444 cm<sup>-1</sup>. Other bends are 2924 cm<sup>-1</sup> and 1634 cm<sup>-1</sup> which were found to be at C-H and C=C stretches respectively. Similar work was carried out by Navid <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R26">26</xref>] where the results were in agreement with the current study.</p>
<fig id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>FT-IR spectrum of CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.002" />
</fig><title>3.2. SEM </title><p>SEM analysis results inFigure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"> 3</xref> show the surface morphology of GPL with scattered layer, porous surface and some particles have irregular sharp which makes GPL suitable for adsorption process. Similar work has been done by Himanshu and Vashi [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R27">27</xref>]. While for CPL inFigure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4"> 4</xref>, the surface morphology appears to have a rough surface with irregular sharps.</p>
<fig id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM image of GPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.003" />
</fig><fig id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM image of CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.004" />
</fig><title>3.3. XRD</title><p>Figures 5 and 6 below displayed XRD spectra of GPL and CPL, respectively. The XRD specturm, of GPL shows pattern at 2&#x26;#x003b8; = 14.96, average crystal size was calculated to be 35.54nm while for CPL inFigure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6"> 6</xref> shows adsorbent peak at 22.48 from which average crystal size was calculated to be 35.76nm.</p>
<fig id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>XRD image of GPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.005" />
</fig><fig id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>XRD image of CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.006" />
</fig><title>3.4. Effect of Adsorbent Dose</title><p>The effect of adsorbent dose of GPL and CPL were investigated from the range of 0.2 &#x26;#x02013; 1g where initial concentration (50 &#x26;#x02013; 1000mg/L) and other parameters were kept constant, as shown in Figures 7 and 8, percentage removal of Pb<sup>2+</sup> for GPL and Cd<sup>2+</sup> for GPL and CPL increases as adsorbent dose also increase until it reaches optimum condition at 1g. While for Pb<sup>2+</sup> CPL which equilibrium was attended at 0.8g. This could be due to the increased adsorbent surface area, pore size and volume, and the availability of vacant sites. The higher adsorbent dosage gave rise to higher removal of metal ions providing an important driving force to overcome all mass transfer resistance of the metal ions between the aqueous and solid phase [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R28">28</xref>]. Optimum dose reached will be used during the experiment.</p>
<fig id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of adsorbent dose on the adsorption of Pb<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.007" />
</fig><fig id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of adsorbent dose on the adsorption of Cd<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.008" />
</fig><title>3.5. Effect of Initial Concentration</title><p>The effect of initial metal concentration (50 &#x26;#x02013; 1000 mg/L) is shown on Figures 9-10 below, where adsorbent dose is at 1g while other parameters were kept constant. From the results obtained percentage removal increases from 89.78 to 99.48 as initial concentration also increases. At low initial concentrations (50 mg/l) most of the metal ions have been removed from aqueous solution. High adsorption at low initial metal concentrations can be attributed to availability of vacant sites for metal binding [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R29">29</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R30">30</xref>].which suggests that increase in adsorbate concentration increase number of available molecules per binding site.</p>
<fig id="fig9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of initial concentration on the adsorption of Pb<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.009" />
</fig><fig id="fig10">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of initial concentration on the adsorption of Cd<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.010" />
</fig><title>3.6. Effect of pH</title><p>Effect of pH on adsorption capacity of GPL and CPL on Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> were investigated with pH range of 2 &#x26;#x02013; 10 while the contact time and other parameters were kept constant. The results are shown in  figures 11 and 12 below indicate that the amount of metal ion adsorbed for Pb<sup>2+</sup> (GPL) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (GPL and CPL) increases until it reaches equilibrium at pH 7 and for Pb<sup>2+</sup> (CPL) which reaches it optimum level at pH 8. This observation can be explained by the fact that the concentration of H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> ion was high at low pH. The scenario will cause completion between H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> and metal ions for active sites on the surface of biosorbents [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R29">29</xref>].</p>
<fig id="fig11">
<label>Figure 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of pH on the adsorption of Pb<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.011" />
</fig><fig id="fig12">
<label>Figure 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of pH on the adsorption of Cd<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.012" />
</fig><title>3.7. Effect of Contact Time</title><p>The effect of contact time on the percentage removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from aqueous solution is shown in Figures 13 and 14 below. Percentage removal increases as time tend to increase until it reaches equilibrium at 60mins, increase in time increases, and the number of sites adsorbed to the metal ions, which becomes difficult for the metal ions to search for the very few remaining sites.</p>
<fig id="fig13">
<label>Figure 13</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Pb<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.013" />
</fig><fig id="fig14">
<label>Figure 14</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Cd<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.014" />
</fig><title>3.8. Effect of Temperature</title><p>Effect of temperature was studied by conducting the experiment at different temperatures stating from 25 to 60<sup>0 </sup>C while other parameters were at equilibrium. As illustrated in Figures 15 and 16 below, percentage removal increases as temperature also increases at 55<sup>0</sup>C which is the optimum level before decreasing. This may be due to the endothermic nature of the adsorption; also the increase of metal ions could be as a result of increase in mobility of the metal ions acquired in the system [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R28">28</xref>].</p>
<fig id="fig15">
<label>Figure 15</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of temperature on the adsorption of Pb<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.015" />
</fig><fig id="fig16">
<label>Figure 16</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of temperature on the adsorption of Cd<sup>2+</sup> on GPL and CPL</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="263.fig.016" />
</fig><title>3.9. Adsorption Isotherm </title><p>The experimental data were analyzed using Langmuir and Freundlich as the two most commonly used isotherm models.Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> and 2 give the overall summaries of both Langmuir and Freundlich models. For Pb<sup>2+</sup> (GPL) with high R<sup>2</sup> values of (0.9116) which show that the experimental data fits well with Freundlich model. The value of K<sub>F</sub> obtained was 7.3029 while that of n was 1.2494. This indicates that the value of n was favorable as it lies between 1 and 10. While, Pb<sup>2+</sup> (CPL) obeys Langmuir model with R<sup>2</sup> value at 0.9855 and K<sub>L</sub> value of -0.0368. </p>
<p>For Cd<sup>2+</sup> (GPL and CPL), the values of R<sup>2</sup> (0.9945 and 0.9948) indicated that Langmuir have better fitted model than Freundlich isotherm. The Langmuir model obtained the adsorbent has a limit number of binding sites with all sites having binding power and the adsorption of each site is non-aligned of each other. As a result, monolayer formation of large ion or molecule between heavy metal ions and the adsorption substrate is the dominant coverage in the untreated control sample [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R31">31</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Isotherm Parameters for Guava Plant Leave (GPL)</p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Isotherm  Models</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="3">  <p><b>Adsorbates  (metal ions)</b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pb<sup>2+</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Cd<sup>2+</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Zn<sup>2+</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Langmuir</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>R<sup>2</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.7354</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9945</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9584</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Q<sub>m</sub></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-19.4553</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-36.1011</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>109.8901</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>K<sub>L</sub></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.2357</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.0222</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0172</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Freunlich</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>R<sup>2</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9116</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9467</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.8628</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>N</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.2494</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.4194</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.1691</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>K<sub>f</sub></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.3029</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.4668</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.4424</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Isotherm Parameters for Cashew Plant Leave (CPL)</p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Isotherm  Models</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="3">  <p><b>Adsorbates  (Metal Ions)</b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b> </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pb<sup>2+</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Cd<sup>2+</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Zn<sup>2+</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Langmuir</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>R<sup>2</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9855</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9948</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9583</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Q<sub>m</sub></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-33.8983</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-23.3645</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>32.3624</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>K<sub>L</sub></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.0368</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.0865</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.1740</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Freunlich</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>R<sup>2</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9587</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9604</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.8791</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>N</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.4240</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.6502</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9614</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>K<sub>f</sub></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.8651</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>29.2954</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.0794</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.10. Kinetic Study</title><p>Tables 3 and 4 below show a summary of both kinetic models. The adsorption kinetics of each heavy metal ion determine under precise time condition was performed. The kind of adsorption process depends on physio-chemical characteristic of the adsorbent and system status like temperature [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R31">31</xref>]. The linear graph of pseudo-first order was plotted from ln (qe-qt) against t (mins) and the graph of pseudo-second order was plotted from t/qt against t (min). From the results obtained, pseudo-second order correlated well with the experimental data better than pseudo-first order. The R<sup>2</sup> from pseudo-second order were much higher than that of pseudo first order and also the theoretical and experimental values are in a good correlation with each other. By contrast, in the pseudo second order model, the calculated qe(cal) values are very close to qe (exp), and the R<sup>2</sup> values converge to 1, indicating the validity of the pseudo second order [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R32">32</xref>], With this we can say that pseudo second order is best fitted for the adsorption.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Kinetic Parameters of Guava Plant Leave (GPL)</p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Absorbates</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="3">  <p><b>Pseudo  first Order</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="3">  <p><b>Pseudo Second  Order</b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>K<sub>1</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>q<sub>e</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>R<sup>2</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>K<sub>2</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>q<sub>e</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>R<sup>2</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Pb<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0003</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.5950</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9221</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.4525</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.4794</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Cd<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0648</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.6960</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9461</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.2336</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.9691</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9992</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Zn<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0313</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.3399</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9235</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.2571</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.1633</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<table-wrap id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Kinetic Parameters of Cashew Plant Leave (CPL)</p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Absorbates</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="3">  <p><b>Pseudo  first Order</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="3">  <p><b>Pseudo  Second Order</b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b> </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>K<sub>1</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>q<sub>e</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>R<sup>2</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>K<sub>2</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>q<sub>e</sub></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>R<sup>2</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Pb<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0019</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>6.053884</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.7346</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.093146</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>9.025271</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9999</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Cd<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.1732</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.956284</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9609</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.128948</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.429421</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b>Zn<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0429</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.637118</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.8880</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.08364</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.379236</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.9999</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.11. Thermodynamic Study</title><p>Thermodynamic parameters are properly assessed; they provide in-depth information regarding the inherent energy and structural changes after adsorption [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R33">33</xref>]. &#x26;#x00394;G is the change in free Gibbs energy (kJmol<sup>&#x26;#x02212;1</sup>), R is the universal gas constant (8.314 Jmol<sup>&#x26;#x02212;1</sup>K<sup>&#x26;#x02212;1</sup>), Ke is the thermodynamic equilibrium constant and T is the absolute temperature (K). </p>
<p>The values of &#x26;#x00394;H and &#x26;#x00394;S were determined from the slope and the intercept from the plot of lnKe against 1/T (K<sup>&#x26;#x02212;1</sup>) in Tables 5 and 6 below which show the summary. For Pb<sup>2+</sup> (GPL), &#x26;#x00394;G value is negative which implies that the processes was spontaneous, a positive &#x26;#x00394;H indicated that adsorption is endothermic while a positive &#x26;#x00394;S indicated an increased randomness at solid-liquid interface. A similar study was reported by Ahmaruzzaman and Gupta [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R34">34</xref>] for the adsorption of heavy metals by rice husk ash, and the positive entropy &#x26;#x00394;S&#x26;#x000b0; confirms the increased randomness at the solid liquid interface [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>]. Pb<sup>2+ </sup>(CPL), &#x26;#x00394;G was negative while &#x26;#x00394;S and &#x26;#x00394;H were also negative. Negative value in &#x26;#x00394;H and &#x26;#x00394;S means that both &#x26;#x00394;H and &#x26;#x00394;S are exothermic. Cd<sup>2+</sup> (GPL), &#x26;#x00394;G was positive indicating that the adsorption took place, but non spontaneous at lower temperature and &#x26;#x00394;H and &#x26;#x00394;S were both positive as well. Cd<sup>2+</sup> (CPL), adsorption showed that &#x26;#x00394;G is negative, while negative &#x26;#x00394;H indicated that the adsorption was exothermic. Positive value of &#x26;#x00394;S showed that affinity of the adsorbent for the solid-liquid interface [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R28">28</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Thermodynamic Parameter for Guava Plant Leave (GPL)</p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Parameters</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >&#916;</b><b  >H</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >&#916;</b><b  >S</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="5">  <p><b >&#916;G</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >R<sup>2</sup></b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >(KJ/mol)</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >(KJ/mol/K)</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b > </b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Temperature(K)</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>298</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>308</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>318</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>328</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>333</p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Pb<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0202</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>68.6927</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-276.84</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-349.35</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1944.8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-3028.8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1803.8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.6854</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Cd<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>13.5222</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>38.7922</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2106.0</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1640.6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>774.09</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>524.1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1083.8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.7625</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Zn<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7.3252</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-26.5640</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1587.3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>392.20</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-726.23</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1466.8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2763.6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.0679</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<table-wrap id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Thermodynamic Parameter for Cashew Plant Leave (CPL)</p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Parameters</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >&#916;</b><b  >H</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >&#916;</b><b  >S</b></p>  </td>  <td colspan="5">  <p><b >&#916;G</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >R<sup>2</sup></b></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >(KJ/mol)</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p><b >(KJ/mol/K)</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Temperature(K)</b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>298</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>308</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>318</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>328</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>333</p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Pb<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-3192.9</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-9.5295</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>539.837</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-852.60</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-129.3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-657.69</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>140.45</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.017</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Cd<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.3699</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.5197</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-694.65</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-801.96</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-322.9</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>554.33</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-116.4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.029</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p><b >Zn<sup>2+</sup></b></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1635.9</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>55.796</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-272.82</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>54.8535</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-252.4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-3380.7</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-548.34</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.2531</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><p></p>
</sec><sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusion</title><p>This study provides a simple, economical and effective adsorption process for removal of adsorbent from wastewater and environment. Instrumental analysis of FTIR, SEM AND XRD results showed promising signs as they were in agreement with most literatures, various percentage removals were obtained for Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> using (GPL and CPL) at optimum conditions. The equilibrium data fitted well with Langmuir isotherm model for Pb<sup>2+</sup> (CLP) with R<sup>2</sup> value 0.9855, Cd<sup>2+</sup> for (GPL and CPL) with R<sup>2</sup> values (0.9945 and 0.9948) while Pb<sup>2+</sup> (GPL) with correlation coefficient at 0.9116 best fitted well with Freundlich isotherm model. Pseudo second order best fitted well than that of the first order kinetics in this study. The thermodynamic study shows that &#x26;#x00394;G is negative in most cases expect for Cd<sup>2+</sup> (GPL) were &#x26;#x00394;G is positive. Whereas &#x26;#x00394;H and &#x26;#x00394;S are positive in some cases showing an endothermic and spontaneous adsorption processes respectively, as well as negative in some. Based on this study, GPL and CPL could be used as a natural adsorbent to remove Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> from wastewater and environment due to their high removal efficiencies.</p>
<p></p>
</sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      
<ref id="R1">
<label>[1]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Arruti, A., Fern&#x000e1;ndez-Olmo, I. and Irabien, A. "Evaluation of the contribution of local sources to trace metals levels in urban PM2.5 and PM10 in the Cantabria region (Northern Spain)." J Environ Monit, 2010, 12(7) :1451-1458.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R2">
<label>[2]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Beyersmann, D. Hartwig, A. "Carcinogenic metal compounds: recent insight into molecular and cellular mechanisms." Arch Toxicol. 2008, 82 (8): 493-512.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R3">
<label>[3]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fu, F. and Wang, Q. "Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters." Journal of Environmental Management. 2011, 92 (3): 407-418.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R4">
<label>[4]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">He, B., Yun, Z., Shi, J. and Jiang, G. "Research progress of heavy metal pollution in China: Sources, analytical methods status and toxicity." Chinese Science Bulletin. 2013, 58 (2): 134-140.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R5">
<label>[5]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mishra, S., Dwivedi, S. P. and Singh, R. K. "A review on epigenetic effect of heavy metal carcinogens on human health. "The Open Nutraceuticals Journal 2010, 3(1): 188-193.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R6">
<label>[6]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Huang, Z., Pan, X. D., Wu, P.G., Han, J. L. and Chen, Q. "Heavy metals in vegetables and the health risk to population in Zhejiang, China." PLoS ONE 2014, 36 (1): 248-252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075007.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R7">
<label>[7]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lalhruaitluanga, H., Jayaram, K., Prasad, M. and Kumar, K. "Lead (II) adsorption from aqueous solutions by raw and activated charcoals of MelocannabacciferaRoxburgh (bamboo), A comparative study." Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 175: 311-318.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R8">
<label>[8]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Demirbas, A. "Heavy Metal Adsorption onto Agro-Based Waste Materials: A Review." Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 157: 220-229.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R9">
<label>[9]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ngah, W.S.W. and Hanafiah, M.A.K.M. "Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater by Chemically Modified Plant Wastes as Adsorbents: A Review." Bioresource Technology 2008, 99: 3935-3948.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R10">
<label>[10]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Heidari, A., Younesi, H., Mehraban, Z. and Heikkinen, H. "Selective Adsorption of Pb (II), Cd(II), and Ni(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Chitosan-MAA Nanoparticles." International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2013, 61: 251-263.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R11">
<label>[11]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bhatnagar, A. and Sillanp&#x000e4;&#x000e4;, M. "Utilization of Agro-Industrial and Municipal Waste Materials as Potential Adsorbents for Water Treatment-A Review." Chemical Engineering Journal 2010, 157: 277-296.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R12">
<label>[12]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Liang, S., Guo, X. and Tian, Q. "Adsorption of Pb2+ and Zn2+ from Aqueous Solutions by Sulfured Orange Peel." Desalination 2011, 275: 212-216.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R13">
<label>[13]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Guo, S., Li, W., Zhang, L., Peng, J., Xia, H. and Zhang, S. "Kinetics and Equilibrium Adsorption Study of Lead (II) onto the Low Cost Adsorbent-Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng." Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009, 87: 343-351.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R14">
<label>[14]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kaur, R., Singh, J., Khare, R., Cameotra, S.S. and Ali, A. "Batch Sorption Dynamics, Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies of Cr(VI), Ni(II) and Cu(II) from Aqueous Phase Using Agricultural Residues." J. Applied Water Science, 2013, 3: 207- 218.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R15">
<label>[15]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Banerjee, K., Ramesh, S.T., Gandhimathi, R., Nidheesh, P.V. and Bharathi, K.S. "A Novel Agricultural Waste Adsorbent, Watermelon Shell for the Removal of Copper from Aqueous Solutions." Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment, 2012, 3: 143-156.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R16">
<label>[16]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Benaissa, H. and Elouchdi, M.A. "Removal of Copper Ions from Aqueous Solutions by Dried Sunflower Leaver." Chemical Engineering and Processing 2007, 46:614-622.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R17">
<label>[17]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wassila, B., Badreddine, B., Boualem, H. and Mohamed, T. "Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Biosorption of M(II) (M = Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn and Cd) onto Seaweed Posidonia oceanica fibers." Applied Water Science, 2019, 9(173).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R18">
<label>[18]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kwon, J.S., Yun, S.T., Lee, J.H., Kim, S.O. and Jo, H.Y. "Removal of Divalent Heavy Metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and Arsenic (III) from Aqueous Solutions Using Scoria: Kinetics and Equilibria of Sorption." Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 174, 307-313.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R19">
<label>[19]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kavitha, D. and Namasivayam, C. "Experimental and kinetic studies on methylene blue adsorption by coir pith carbon." Biores. Tech. 2007, 98: 14-21.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R20">
<label>[20]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Weber, T. W. and Chakkravorti, R. K. "Pore and Solid Diffusion Models for Fixed Bed Adsorbers." Amer. Inst. Chem. J, 1974, 20: 228.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R21">
<label>[21]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hashemian, S. "Utilization of Modified Sawdust for Removal of Methyl Violet (Basic Dye) From Aqueous Solutions." Asian J. Chem, 2009, 21(4): 3622-3630.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R22">
<label>[22]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bulut, Y. and Baysal, Z. "Removal of Pb(II) from wastewater using wheat bran. J. Environ. Manage 2006, 78 (2): 107-113.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R23">
<label>[23]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ponnusami, V., Vikram, S. and Srivastava, S.N. "Guava (Psidium guajava) Leaf Powder: Novel Adsorbent for Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solutions." J. Hazard. Mater, 2008, 152 (1): 276-286.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R24">
<label>[24]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Guimar&#x000e3;es, B., Silva, J. T. T., Santos, K. G., Vieira Neto, J. L. "Sequencing of unit operations for integral and sustainable peanut processing." Research, Society and Development. 2020
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R25">
<label>[25]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mohrig, J.R., Hammond, C.N. and Schatz, P.F. "Techniques in Organic Chemistry." 2nd Edition, W. H. Freeman, New York. 2006
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R26">
<label>[26]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Navid, N.H., Zavvar, M., Eskandar, K., Aisan, K. "Orange tree Leaves, A Perfect Adsorbent for the Removal of Cd(II), Co(II) and Zn(II) from Wastewater." Department of Chemistry, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 2019, 25(2): 107&#x02212;117.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R27">
<label>[27]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Himanshu, P. and Vashi, R. T. "Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Reactive Dyes onto Activated Guava Leaf Powder." J. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2011, 20(3).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R28">
<label>[28]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mustapha, S., Shuaib, D. T., Ndamitso, M. M., Etsuyankpa, M. B., Sumaila, A., Mohammed, U. M., Nasirudeen, M. B. "Adsorption Isotherm, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies for the Removal of Pb(II), Cd(II), Zn(II) and Cu(II) ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Albizia lebbeck Pods." Applied Water Science, 2019, 9(142).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R29">
<label>[29]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Reddy, D.H.K., Seshaiah, K., Reddy, A.V.R., Rao, M.M. and Wang, M.C. "Biosorption of Pb2+ from Aqueous Solutions by Moringa oleifera Bark: Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies." Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010, 174: 831-838.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R30">
<label>[30]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Etim, U.J., Umoren, S.A. and Eduok, U.M "Coconut Coir Dust as a Low Cost Adsorbent for the Removal of Cationic Dye from Aqueous Solution." Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2012
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R31">
<label>[31]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Navid, N., Hassan, Z. M., Eskandar, K., Aisan, K. "Orange Tree Leaves, a Perfect Adsorbent to the Remove Cd (II), Co (II), Zn (II) from Wastewater." Department of Chemistry, Semnan University, Iran. Iran. Chem. Ind. Chem. 2018
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R32">
<label>[32]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ncibi, M., Mahjoub, B., Hamissa, A. B., Mansour, R. B., Seffen, M. "Biosorption of Textile Metal Complexed dye from Aqueous Medium using Posidonia Oceanica (L.) Leaf sheaths: Mathematical modelling." Desalination 2009. 243:109-121.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R33">
<label>[33]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Liangcheng, X., Kangle, D., Yan, L., Mei, Z., Chao, H. "Experimental, Thermodynamic and Kinetic Studies for the Adsorption of Phenolic Compounds Derived from Oilfield Wastewater by the Corncob Hydrochar." Open Journal of Yangtze Gas and Oil, 2019, 4: 285-300.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R34">
<label>[34]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ahmaruzzaman, M. and Gupta, V.K. "Rice husk and its ash as low-cost adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment." Ind Eng Chem Res, 2011, 50:13589-13613.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>