Back to Article
Advance of AI-Based Predictive Models for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in Healthcare
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data
| Vol 2, Issue 1
Table 1. Summary on Machine Learning-Driven for EarlyDetection of Alzheimer's Disease in Healthcare
| References | Methodology | Dataset | Performance | Limitations & Future Work |
| Afzal et al., 2019 | Transfer learning + data augmentation on 3D MRI | OASIS | 98.41% (single view), 95.11% (3D view) | Class imbalance in dataset; need for balanced multiclass classification of AD stages |
| Ahmed et al., 2019 | CNN ensemble on TVPs of left/right hippocampus | GARD | 90.05% accuracy | Focused only on hippocampus; small dataset; overfitting still a concern |
| Silva et al., 2019 | Deep feature extraction + classical ML classifiers (RF, SVM, K-NN) | MIRIAD | RF: 88.32%, SVM: 96.07%, K-NN: 87.45% | Limited region of brain (30 slices); classification only between AD vs. HC |
| Altaf et al., 2018 | Hybrid of clinical + texture features; BoVW model | ADNI | Binary: 98.4%, Multi-class: 79.8% | Moderate performance in multi-class classification; relies on handcrafted features |
| Mahyoub et al., 2018 | ML classifiers on lifestyle, demography, and medical history | Custom tabular dataset | Sensitivity: 0.741, Specificity: 0.515 (test) | Poor generalization; low precision; limited data modalities |
| Padole et al., 2018 | Graph CNN using resting-state fMRI | ADNI | 92.44% accuracy | Focused only on fMRI; computationally intensive graph construction |