Contribution to the Ethnobotanical Knowledge of Serre Calabre (Southern Italy)
Table 4. Most recurrenttaxa sorted by Relative Frequency ofCitation (RFC).
|
| Basic value | Indices | ||||
| Taxa | UR | U | NC | FC | CI | RFC |
| Sambucus nigra L. | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0.41 | 0.24 |
| Malva sylvestris L. | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.24 |
| Erica arborea L. | 7 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0.41 | 0.18 |
| Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T. Durand & Schinz | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0.35 | 0.18 |
| Matricaria chamomilla L. | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0.35 | 0.18 |
| Spartium junceum L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Urtica dioica L. | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.12 |
| Anethum foeniculum L. | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.12 |
| Daucus carota L. | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0.24 | 0.12 |
| Lavandula angustifolia Mill. | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0.29 | 0.06 |
| Equisetum telmateia Ehrh. | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| Umbilicus rupestris (Salisb.) Dandy | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| Laurus nobilis L. | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| Robinia pseudoacacia L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Hypochaeris radicata L. | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Mentha pulegium L. | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Plantago major L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Quercus ilex L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Rosa sempervirens L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Salvia officinalis L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 |
1 Basic values: UR = Number of interviews ('citations'); U= Number of different categories of use.
NC = Number of different purposes; FC = Number of informants mentioning the taxon.
Indexes: CI = Cultural Importance Index.