Adolescents' Psychosomatic Symptoms and Family Affluence in the Czech Republic: Based on National Evidence
Table 3. The mediation analysis suggesting the complete mediator role of “talks toparents”.
| Path Type | Effect | Estimate | SE | β | z | p |
| Indirect | class_family affluence1 ⇒ talk to father ⇒ diagnosis_PS | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -10.04 | < .001 |
| class_family affluence1 ⇒ talk to mother ⇒ diagnosis_PS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -4.32 | < .001 | |
| class_family affluence2 ⇒ talk to father ⇒ diagnosis_PS | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -10.56 | < .001 | |
| class_family affluence2 ⇒ talk to mother ⇒ diagnosis_PS | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.01 | -5.47 | < .001 | |
| Direct | class_family affluence1 ⇒ diagnosis_PS | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.01 | -1.30 | 0.20 |
| class_family affluence2 ⇒ diagnosis_PS | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| Total | class_family affluence1 ⇒ diagnosis_PS | -0.04 | 0.01 | -0.04 | -3.61 | < .001 |
| class_family affluence2 ⇒ diagnosis_PS | -0.03 | 0.01 | -0.02 | -2.33 | 0.02 |
Note: (1)Betas are completely standardized effect sizes; (2) class_family affluence1 = middle SES - low SES, class_family affluence2 = upper SES - low SES; (3) diagnosis_PS referred to the diagnosis of psychosomatic symptoms.