Back to Article
Evaluation of the Incidences of Risk Occurrence and Severity in PPP-Procured Mass Housing Projects (PPP-MHPs) in Abuja, Nigeria
World Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
| Vol 2, Issue 1
Table 6. Level of Severity of Risk Factors in PPPprocured Mass Housing Projects- Cont’d
| Risk Factors | Risk Severity | Std. Deviation | Rank | Asymp.Sig |
| Land Grabbing/Encroachment | 5.52 | 0.77 | 18 | 0.388 |
| Inadequate distribution of Authority between Partners | 5.51 | 0.765 | 19 | .000* |
| Construction cost overrun | 5.50 | 0.567 | 20 | .000* |
| Prolonged negotiation period prior to initiation | 5.48 | 0.586 | 21 | .000* |
| Interest rate volatility | 5.47 | 0.76 | 22 | .000* |
| Poor Financial Market | 5.46 | 0.963 | 23 | .000* |
| Poor decision-making process | 5.45 | 0.604 | 24 | 0.931 |
| Influential Economic Events (Boom/Recession) | 5.41 | 0.785 | 25 | .000* |
| High Bidding cost | 5.38 | 0.848 | 26 | 0.029 |
| Financial attraction to project investors | 5.36 | 1.047 | 27 | 0.064 |
| Delay in Project approvals and permits | 5.34 | 0.641 | 28 | 0.540 |
| Change in Government | 5.30 | 1.073 | 29 | 0.031 |
| Public opposition to the mass housing projects | 5.15 | 1.286 | 30 | 0.001* |
| Weather | 5.08 | 1.092 | 31 | .000* |
| Inflation rate volatility | 5.06 | 0.992 | 32 | .000* |
| Operation cost overrun | 5.04 | 0.716 | 33 | .000* |
| Insolvency/default of Subcontractors and Suppliers | 5.02 | 0.873 | 34 | .000* |
| Inability to service debt | 4.99 | 0.895 | 35 | 0.010 |
| Excessive contract variation | 4.93 | 0.832 | 36 | .000* |
| Organization and Coordination risk | 4.92 | 0.805 | 37 | .000* |
| Bankruptcy of the investors (OPS) | 4.87 | 1.028 | 38 | 0.011 |
| Operational revenue below the projection | 4.80 | 0.719 | 39 | .000* |
| Geotechnical conditions | 4.79 | 0.946 | 40 | .000* |
| Different working methods/know-how between partners | 4.75 | 0.781 | 41 | .000* |
| Lack of tradition of private provision of public services | 4.70 | 0.999 | 42 | 0.052 |
| Lack of Government guarantee | 4.70 | 1.091 | 43 | 0.140 |
| Legislation change/Inconsistencies | 4.68 | 0.861 | 44 | 0.322 |
| Environment | 4.67 | 0.639 | 45 | 0.062 |
| Inconsistencies in Government Policies | 4.66 | 1.105 | 46 | .000* |
| Availability of appropriate labour/material | 4.64 | 0.912 | 47 | 0.014 |
| Third party tort liability | 4.61 | 0.692 | 48 | 0.001* |
| Possible expropriation/nationalization of assets | 4.60 | 0.912 | 49 | .000* |
| Rate of Return restrictions | 4.60 | 1.177 | 50 | .000* |
| Low operating productivity | 4.59 | 0.619 | 51 | .000* |
| Competition risk | 4.55 | 0.837 | 52 | .000* |
| Import and Export restriction | 4.49 | 0.625 | 53 | .000* |
| Poor Quality of Workmanship | 4.48 | 0.814 | 54 | 0.041 |
| Unproven Engineering techniques | 4.45 | 0.694 | 55 | .000* |
| Design deficiencies | 4.40 | 1.15 | 56 | 0.007* |
| Residual value (After concession period) | 4.38 | 0.771 | 57 | .000* |
| Staff crises | 4.36 | 0.589 | 58 | 0.043 |
| Industrial regulation change | 4.30 | 0.755 | 59 | .004* |
| Late design changes | 4.30 | 1.041 | 60 | 0.620 |
| Change in tax regulation | 4.29 | 1.016 | 61 | .000* |
| Cultural differences between the main Stakeholders | 4.23 | 1.189 | 62 | .000* |
| Strong Political opposition | 4.14 | 0.913 | 63 | .000* |